|
Small investors are abandoning the stock market leaving
professionals and computers in charge. Is that a bullish or bearish sign
ultimately?
The contrarian view of investing is that when you bet against the small investor,
in times of extreme joy or fear, you'll make money. The theory is that the little
guy always gets it wrong at market extremes, buying into rallies near the top
and selling at the bottom. That's why the current situation, in which small investors
are clearly capitulating is worth exploring.
According to The Wall Street Journal: "Many individual investors were tiptoeing
back into stocks in the spring. Now, they're running for cover again." Frightened
by the Flash Crash and the rising volatility due to computer model based trading,
small investors are getting fed up with stocks and moving their money into bonds,
annuities, and even cash. The Journal reported: "Small investors' faith in stocks,
which surged in the 1990s, has collapsed since the technology-stock debacle and
the Enron and WorldCom scandals of 2000-2002. The 2007-2009 financial crisis
only made things worse. Now, the pullback among ordinary investors means they
are a declining force in a market that is increasingly dominated by professionals."
This isn't the first time this has happened. According to the Journal: "in 2002,
investors withdrew more money from mutual funds that invest in U.S. stocks than
they put in. Then from 2007 through 2009 they withdrew money for three consecutive
years. That marked the first three-year period of withdrawals since 1979-1981,
according to the Investment Company Institute, a mutual-fund trade group. This
year, U.S.-stock funds saw inflows in January, March and April, but net withdrawals
resumed in May." Yet, contrary to the traditional contrarian view, the periods
during which small investors withdrew money from mutual funds corresponded to
periods when the markets declined significantly.
In fact, the Journal reported: "Individual investors were important market pillars
in the 1990s, but their flight from stocks is changing the market dynamic. By
adding money to mutual funds, individuals helped push stocks higher in the 1990s
and to a lesser extent from 2003 through 2006. Now they are moving money out
again on balance, making them a drag on the market."
And what's most interesting is that individual investor money flows may be a
whole lot more significant than the contrarian investment theory accounts for.
According to The Journal: "After getting hurt in the 2000 tech-stock crunch,
individuals came back to U.S.-stock funds in 2003, as stocks were entering a
new bull market, ICI data show. But the buying proved tepid and turned to net
selling in the latter part of 2006, even before the bull market ended in 2007.
Despite occasional periods of inflows to U.S.-stock funds, the selling trend
has continued since then. Individuals removed a net $7 billion from stock funds
in the seven days ending May 12 and $13 billion two weeks later, eclipsing the
deposits from earlier in the year."
That suggests that when small investors move en masse, they have the ability
to affect the markets, via the activity in mutual funds. And that makes sense,
mutual funds are little more than money sieves in and out of the market. As long
as money keeps pouring in, they buy stock. And when they are hit with withdrawals,
the effect is the opposite.
And if you look at what stocks have provided, you wonder why it took individual
investors, who are mostly buy and hold investors, so long. According to The Journal: "The
Standard & Poor's 500 stock index has fallen at an annualized rate of 3%
a year over the past 10 years, including dividends and controlling for inflation.
Long-term Treasury bonds show a gain of 5% a year during that same period, after
inflation. Gold is up 10% a year and real-estate investment trusts 8% a year.
The S&P 500 index itself, without adjusting for inflation and dividends,
is stuck today at a level it first reached 12 years ago, meaning it has gone
nowhere in more than a decade, scaring a legion of people in the process."
So it's no surprise that rallies don't last as they once did, or that market
breadth has been weak of late. Most interesting is this: "individual investors
appear to be losing faith in an investment strategy called buying on the dips.
In times of stock strength, people learn to buy stocks after a decline, when
they are cheaper, because the stocks have a tendency to recover. Lately, investors
have been reversing that behavior, selling on dips for fear the declines will
continue. The Yale School of Management maintains an index, designed by Professor
Robert Shiller, that tracks individuals' willingness to buy on dips, based on
a monthly survey of wealthy investors. The index topped out in 2002. While it
has moved up and down since then, it has been falling since the start of 2009."
Perhaps, this is the most telling of all facts. According to The Journal: "Some
investors, haunted by the continuing credit crunch and unemployment fears, are
being driven to pull money out of stock funds to make up budget shortfalls. Also
eating away at risk tolerance is demographics: Baby boomers are aging, making
them think more about preserving their holdings' value. This is only part of
the story, however: The Investment Company Institute data show lower risk tolerance
among younger people, too. In surveys of mutual-fund owners, the ICI found that
just 30% said in 2009 that they were willing to take above-average or substantial
risk in the stock market, down from 37% in 2008. The number willing to take only
below-average risk or no risk at all rose to 20% from 14%."
Conclusion
American investors are returning to behavior patterns not seen for three decades.
And if investing behavior is an indication of overall behavior, things will be
different for a good while, given the penetration of the behavior accross all
age groups and demographics.
What makes the data in this article compelling is the connection between individual
investor mutual fund withdrawals and the persistence of long term down trends
in the stock market over the last decade.
That suggests that the current down trend, may not end for some time.
And here's where things may be most telling. Conservative behavior is life may
translate into conservative tendencies at the polls. So just when the "change" dynamic
is trying to deliver its coup de gras, it may run into a new wave of conservatism.
We are clearly in a state of flux in this market, and in the country.
We'll be on Twitter
some time today before the market closes with some updated comments.
Know when to sell and how to make money when the market falls. Get
a detailed trading plan in your pocket. Read Dr. Duarte's All
NEW Books "Market Timing For Dummies." and "Trading Futures For Dummies." The Trading Manuals for
All Seasons. Also Available As Kindle Books. |
|
|
|
Shares of Starwood Hotels (NYSE: HOT) seem to be gathering
support.

Chart Courtesy of StockCharts.com
The hotel industry traditionally suffers from economic
softness. Yet, over the last few months, during our
frequent travels, we've noticed that hotels don't
seem to be hurting.
This scribe stays mostly at Hilton brands. And Hilton is a privately held company,
with a large debt load. Yet, despite reports of some difficulties, Hilton's middle
market brands, Hampton Inn, and the slightly higher level Homewood Suites, in
smaller and middle sized markets are consistently full during weekends, as far
as we've seen.
This past weekend, in San Antonio, we saw more of the same, full parking lots,
and heavy traffic. But not just at Hilton Brands. Other imprints had the same
activity, including Marriott, Omni, Hyatt, and Starwood.
And if traffic is what moves hotels, the Starwood shares may be telling us something.
The stock bounced off of its 200-day moving average recently, and is showing
signs of continued improvement in this market, which is also trying to bounce.
Starwood's earnings are due to be released on July 22nd, before the market opens.
Shares seem to be moving up ahead of the announcement, suggesting that others
besides us have been looking at traffic in the hotel industry.
Follow Dr. Duarte on Twitter
|
|
|
|
| |
|